關于建設項目竣工(gong)環(huan)保驗收(shou)是(shi)否可由(you)環(huan)評單位(wei)承擔(dan)問題的回復(fu)

2019-04-01

來(lai)信：

根據新(xin)修(xiu)改的《建(jian)(jian)設(she)(she)項(xiang)目(mu)(mu)(mu)(mu)環(huan)境(jing)保(bao)(bao)護(hu)管(guan)理(li)(li)條例》及(ji)《建(jian)(jian)設(she)(she)項(xiang)目(mu)(mu)(mu)(mu)竣(jun)工(gong)環(huan)境(jing)保(bao)(bao)護(hu)驗(yan)收(shou)暫行辦法》，均(jun)未明確(que)建(jian)(jian)設(she)(she)項(xiang)目(mu)(mu)(mu)(mu)竣(jun)工(gong)環(huan)境(jing)保(bao)(bao)護(hu)驗(yan)收(shou)是(shi)否可由該項(xiang)目(mu)(mu)(mu)(mu)原(yuan)環(huan)評(ping)單(dan)(dan)位(wei)承(cheng)擔。而目(mu)(mu)(mu)(mu)前在(zai)(zai)實際(ji)操作(zuo)過(guo)程中部(bu)分管(guan)理(li)(li)人(ren)員及(ji)專家(jia)依然以原(yuan)《建(jian)(jian)設(she)(she)項(xiang)目(mu)(mu)(mu)(mu)竣(jun)工(gong)環(huan)境(jing)保(bao)(bao)護(hu)驗(yan)收(shou)辦法》（原(yuan)環(huan)保(bao)(bao)總(zong)局令第13號）中“承(cheng)擔該建(jian)(jian)設(she)(she)項(xiang)目(mu)(mu)(mu)(mu)環(huan)境(jing)影響評(ping)價工(gong)作(zuo)的單(dan)(dan)位(wei)不得同(tong)時承(cheng)擔該建(jian)(jian)設(she)(she)項(xiang)目(mu)(mu)(mu)(mu)環(huan)境(jing)保(bao)(bao)護(hu)驗(yan)收(shou)調(diao)查報告（表）的編(bian)制工(gong)作(zuo)”為(wei)(wei)依據，認(ren)(ren)為(wei)(wei)建(jian)(jian)設(she)(she)單(dan)(dan)位(wei)委托原(yuan)環(huan)評(ping)單(dan)(dan)位(wei)開展驗(yan)收(shou)工(gong)作(zuo)。這(zhe)是(shi)否合理(li)(li)呢？根據新(xin)的驗(yan)收(shou)管(guan)理(li)(li)精神，個人(ren)認(ren)(ren)為(wei)(wei)，在(zai)(zai)明確(que)主體責任(ren)的情況(kuang)下，原(yuan)環(huan)評(ping)單(dan)(dan)位(wei)開展竣(jun)工(gong)環(huan)保(bao)(bao)驗(yan)收(shou)對項(xiang)目(mu)(mu)(mu)(mu)實際(ji)情況(kuang)更(geng)(geng)了解(jie)，在(zai)(zai)指導措施的落(luo)實情況(kuang)下更(geng)(geng)具(ju)有(you)針對性。請(qing)貴部(bu)明確(que)在(zai)(zai)新(xin)的管(guan)理(li)(li)要求(qiu)下，環(huan)評(ping)單(dan)(dan)位(wei)是(shi)否可以同(tong)時承(cheng)擔該項(xiang)目(mu)(mu)(mu)(mu)竣(jun)工(gong)環(huan)保(bao)(bao)驗(yan)收(shou)工(gong)作(zuo)呢？

回復：

　　建(jian)設(she)(she)項(xiang)(xiang)目竣(jun)工(gong)環(huan)(huan)境(jing)保(bao)護(hu)驗(yan)收(shou)管理辦法》目前(qian)尚未廢止，第十三條(tiao)“承(cheng)擔(dan)該(gai)(gai)建(jian)設(she)(she)項(xiang)(xiang)目環(huan)(huan)境(jing)影(ying)響(xiang)評(ping)價工(gong)作(zuo)的單(dan)位(wei)不(bu)得同時承(cheng)擔(dan)該(gai)(gai)建(jian)設(she)(she)項(xiang)(xiang)目環(huan)(huan)境(jing)保(bao)護(hu)驗(yan)收(shou)調查報告（表）的編制工(gong)作(zuo)”仍然(ran)有效，因此，雖然(ran)原環(huan)(huan)評(ping)單(dan)位(wei)開展竣(jun)工(gong)環(huan)(huan)保(bao)驗(yan)收(shou)對項(xiang)(xiang)目實(shi)際(ji)情況更了解，但(dan)環(huan)(huan)評(ping)單(dan)位(wei)不(bu)可以承(cheng)擔(dan)該(gai)(gai)項(xiang)(xiang)目竣(jun)工(gong)環(huan)(huan)保(bao)驗(yan)收(shou)工(gong)作(zuo)。

關(guan)于畜禽養殖環保竣工驗收流(liu)程疑問(wen)的回復

2019-04-01

來信：

2017年11月(yue)20日生(sheng)態環境(jing)部頒布實施(shi)(shi)(shi)了《建設(she)項(xiang)目(mu)(mu) 竣工(gong)環境(jing)保護驗(yan)(yan)(yan)收(shou)暫行(xing)辦(ban)法(fa)》（以(yi)下簡(jian)稱《辦(ban)法(fa)》），《辦(ban)法(fa)》第(di)六條規(gui)定(ding)(ding)：“驗(yan)(yan)(yan)收(shou)監測應(ying)當在(zai)確保主(zhu)體工(gong)程(cheng)調(diao)試工(gong)況(kuang)穩定(ding)(ding)、環境(jing)保護設(she)施(shi)(shi)(shi)運(yun)行(xing)正常的(de)(de)情況(kuang)下進行(xing)，并如(ru)實記錄監測時(shi)的(de)(de)實際(ji)工(gong)況(kuang)……”，這里明(ming)確指出驗(yan)(yan)(yan)收(shou)工(gong)作的(de)(de)開展是(shi)建立在(zai)工(gong)程(cheng)調(diao)試的(de)(de)基礎上(shang)，對(dui)于(yu)畜(chu)禽養殖項(xiang)目(mu)(mu)來說，環保工(gong)程(cheng)調(diao)試、設(she)施(shi)(shi)(shi)的(de)(de)正常運(yun)行(xing)必須要先投(tou)(tou)產(chan)才能產(chan)生(sheng)污染物，否則無法(fa)進行(xing)監測，無法(fa)反映環保設(she)施(shi)(shi)(shi)的(de)(de)運(yun)行(xing)情況(kuang)；《辦(ban)法(fa)》第(di)七(qi)條又規(gui)定(ding)(ding)：“建設(she)項(xiang)目(mu)(mu)配套(tao)建設(she)的(de)(de)環境(jing)保護設(she)施(shi)(shi)(shi)經驗(yan)(yan)(yan)收(shou)合格后，其(qi)主(zhu)體工(gong)程(cheng)方可投(tou)(tou)入生(sheng)產(chan)或者使(shi)用(yong)(yong)；未(wei)經驗(yan)(yan)(yan)收(shou)或者驗(yan)(yan)(yan)收(shou)不(bu)合格的(de)(de)，不(bu)得投(tou)(tou)入生(sheng)產(chan)或者使(shi)用(yong)(yong)”，也明(ming)確了環保驗(yan)(yan)(yan)收(shou)與項(xiang)目(mu)(mu)投(tou)(tou)產(chan)的(de)(de)先后順序，即必須要先進行(xing)驗(yan)(yan)(yan)收(shou)并通過(guo)(guo)才能投(tou)(tou)產(chan)，以(yi)上(shang)兩項(xiang)條款存(cun)在(zai)上(shang)下矛盾的(de)(de)嫌疑(yi)，尤其(qi)在(zai)地方環保部門在(zai)執法(fa)過(guo)(guo)程(cheng)中，對(dui)上(shang)述條款理(li)解不(bu)一(yi)樣，項(xiang)目(mu)(mu)投(tou)(tou)產(chan)后再驗(yan)(yan)(yan)收(shou)是(shi)否屬于(yu)“未(wei)驗(yan)(yan)(yan)先投(tou)(tou)”的(de)(de)違法(fa)行(xing)為一(yi)直沒有(you)明(ming)確的(de)(de)依(yi)據(ju)，給企業在(zai)手續辦(ban)理(li)、生(sheng)產(chan)經營(ying)過(guo)(guo)程(cheng)中帶來了諸多(duo)不(bu)便(bian)。

回復：

　　一、《建(jian)(jian)(jian)設(she)(she)項(xiang)目竣工(gong)環(huan)(huan)(huan)境(jing)(jing)保(bao)(bao)護(hu)(hu)驗收暫(zan)行辦法》第七條(tiao)規定(ding)“建(jian)(jian)(jian)設(she)(she)項(xiang)目配(pei)套建(jian)(jian)(jian)設(she)(she)的環(huan)(huan)(huan)境(jing)(jing)保(bao)(bao)護(hu)(hu)設(she)(she)施經驗收合格后，其(qi)主(zhu)體(ti)(ti)工(gong)程方(fang)可(ke)投(tou)入生產或者使用”，明確要求先驗收、后投(tou)產。 二、《建(jian)(jian)(jian)設(she)(she)項(xiang)目竣工(gong)環(huan)(huan)(huan)境(jing)(jing)保(bao)(bao)護(hu)(hu)驗收暫(zan)行辦法》第五條(tiao)規定(ding)“建(jian)(jian)(jian)設(she)(she)項(xiang)目竣工(gong)后，建(jian)(jian)(jian)設(she)(she)單位(wei)應(ying)當如(ru)實查(cha)驗、監測(ce)、記載建(jian)(jian)(jian)設(she)(she)項(xiang)目環(huan)(huan)(huan)境(jing)(jing)保(bao)(bao)護(hu)(hu)設(she)(she)施的建(jian)(jian)(jian)設(she)(she)和(he)調(diao)試(shi)情況，編制(zhi)驗收監測(ce)（調(diao)查(cha)）報告 ”，即建(jian)(jian)(jian)設(she)(she)單位(wei)可(ke)以對建(jian)(jian)(jian)設(she)(she)項(xiang)目配(pei)套建(jian)(jian)(jian)設(she)(she)的環(huan)(huan)(huan)境(jing)(jing)保(bao)(bao)護(hu)(hu)設(she)(she)施進行調(diao)試(shi)，相(xiang)應(ying)的，其(qi)主(zhu)體(ti)(ti)工(gong)程（生產工(gong)藝）應(ying)同步調(diao)試(shi)，“調(diao)試(shi)”不(bu)同于“投(tou)產”，兩(liang)者之間并不(bu)矛盾。

關于驗收執行標準和驗收工況問題的回復

2019-04-01

來(lai)信：

目(mu)前新的驗(yan)收技術(shu)指南(nan)規定了驗(yan)收標(biao)準按(an)(an)新標(biao)準執行(xing)，并無具(ju)體工況規定；可是(shi)有許(xu)多(duo)行(xing)業驗(yan)收技術(shu)規范的驗(yan)收執行(xing)標(biao)準仍然為環評批復(fu)標(biao)準，并按(an)(an)新標(biao)準考核，同時(shi)對工況符合也有規定。那么，遇到這(zhe)種(zhong)情況時(shi)該怎(zen)么辦？

回復：

　　一、按照(zhao)《建(jian)設(she)項(xiang)目(mu)(mu)(mu)竣(jun)工(gong)環(huan)境(jing)(jing)保(bao)護驗(yan)收技術指南(nan) 污染影響(xiang)類》有(you)關規(gui)(gui)定(ding)(ding)，建(jian)設(she)項(xiang)目(mu)(mu)(mu)竣(jun)工(gong)環(huan)境(jing)(jing)保(bao)護驗(yan)收，執行(xing)(xing)批復文件(jian)所規(gui)(gui)定(ding)(ding)的(de)(de)(de)(de)標(biao)(biao)(biao)準(zhun)。若(ruo)環(huan)境(jing)(jing)影響(xiang)報(bao)告(gao)書（表(biao)）審批之后(hou)發布或修(xiu)訂的(de)(de)(de)(de)標(biao)(biao)(biao)準(zhun)，且(qie)對建(jian)設(she)項(xiang)目(mu)(mu)(mu)執行(xing)(xing)該(gai)標(biao)(biao)(biao)準(zhun)有(you)明確時(shi)限要求的(de)(de)(de)(de)，要在(zai)指定(ding)(ding)時(shi)間執行(xing)(xing)新(xin)標(biao)(biao)(biao)準(zhun)。 二、按照(zhao)《建(jian)設(she)項(xiang)目(mu)(mu)(mu)竣(jun)工(gong)環(huan)境(jing)(jing)保(bao)護驗(yan)收暫行(xing)(xing)辦法》有(you)關規(gui)(gui)定(ding)(ding)，驗(yan)收監(jian)測應當(dang)在(zai)確保(bao)主體工(gong)程調試工(gong)況(kuang)穩定(ding)(ding)、環(huan)境(jing)(jing)保(bao)護設(she)施(shi)運行(xing)(xing)正常(chang)的(de)(de)(de)(de)情況(kuang)下(xia)進行(xing)(xing)，并如實記錄(lu)監(jian)測時(shi)的(de)(de)(de)(de)實際工(gong)況(kuang)。若(ruo)國家和(he)地方有(you)關污染物排(pai)放(fang)標(biao)(biao)(biao)準(zhun)或者行(xing)(xing)業驗(yan)收技術規(gui)(gui)范對工(gong)況(kuang)和(he)生產(chan)負(fu)荷(he)另有(you)規(gui)(gui)定(ding)(ding)的(de)(de)(de)(de)，按其規(gui)(gui)定(ding)(ding)執行(xing)(xing)。

關于驗收中廢氣監測頻次問題的回復

2019-04-01

來信(xin)：

驗收技術指南6.3.4中(zhong)：1）有(you)(you)(you)明顯生(sheng)產周期，穩定(ding)排放(fang)的(de)(de)項目，每(mei)個周期采(cai)集3-多次(ci)(ci)(ci)（不(bu)應少于(yu)執行(xing)標準中(zhong)規定(ding)的(de)(de)次(ci)(ci)(ci)數(shu)），此時(shi)(shi)(shi)的(de)(de)“次(ci)(ci)(ci)”是(shi)(shi)(shi)指有(you)(you)(you)效小(xiao)時(shi)(shi)(shi)值(zhi)的(de)(de)次(ci)(ci)(ci)數(shu)還是(shi)(shi)(shi)樣(yang)品(pin)的(de)(de)數(shu)量？以有(you)(you)(you)組(zu)織(zhi)非甲烷(wan)總烴為例，是(shi)(shi)(shi)1小(xiao)時(shi)(shi)(shi)等(deng)時(shi)(shi)(shi)間間隔采(cai)集4個樣(yang)品(pin)，還是(shi)(shi)(shi)3個小(xiao)時(shi)(shi)(shi)采(cai)集12個樣(yang)品(pin)； 2）無(wu)明顯生(sheng)產周期，穩定(ding)排放(fang)的(de)(de)項目，每(mei)天不(bu)少于(yu)3個樣(yang)品(pin)，此時(shi)(shi)(shi)的(de)(de)3個樣(yang)品(pin)是(shi)(shi)(shi)否要(yao)考(kao)慮不(bu)同(tong)污染物(wu)采(cai)樣(yang)時(shi)(shi)(shi)間的(de)(de)一(yi)致(zhi)性(xing)，以無(wu)組(zu)織(zhi)監測為例，總懸浮顆(ke)粒物(wu)是(shi)(shi)(shi)采(cai)3個樣(yang)品(pin)（3小(xiao)時(shi)(shi)(shi)），非甲烷(wan)總烴采(cai)4個樣(yang)品(pin)（1小(xiao)時(shi)(shi)(shi)），兩者(zhe)采(cai)樣(yang)時(shi)(shi)(shi)間不(bu)用考(kao)慮同(tong)步(bu)； 該如何理解？

回復：

　　一、“有明顯生產周期，穩定排放的項目，每個周期采集3-多次”，此處的“次”是指“有效小時值”的次數。 二、“無明顯生產周期，穩定排放的項目，每天不少于3個樣品”，不同污染物的采樣時間可以不同步。

山東新澤儀器有限公司助(zhu)力環保驗收(shou)，研發的煙(yan)氣(qi)在線(xian)監測系統從企業的實際情(qing)況出發，操(cao)作(zuo)簡單(dan)，維護方便，測量(liang)準確。lm